On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 12:05:02PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > The irq remapping layer seems to cause some confusion when people > see a different irq number in /proc/interrupts vs the one they > request in their driver or DTS. > > So have the irq remapping layer print out a message when we map an > irq. The message is only printed the first time the irq is mapped, > and it's KERN_DEBUG so most people won't see it. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mich...@ellerman.id.au>
I like the patch in general... > --- > arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c | 4 +++- > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c > index 5576147..8c1a496 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c > @@ -672,11 +672,13 @@ unsigned int irq_create_mapping(struct irq_host *host, > return NO_IRQ; > } > } > - pr_debug("irq: -> obtained virq %d\n", virq); > > if (irq_setup_virq(host, virq, hwirq)) > return NO_IRQ; > > + printk(KERN_DEBUG "irq: irq %lu on host %s mapped to virtual irq %u\n", > + hwirq, host->of_node ? host->of_node->full_name : "null", virq); > + Are you replacing the pr_debug because you want to drop the DEBUG-dependency? > return virq; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_create_mapping); > -- > 1.6.1.2 > > _______________________________________________ > Linuxppc-dev mailing list > Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org > https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev