On Apr 5, 2009, at 9:39 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 2:52 AM, Anton Vorontsov
<avoront...@ru.mvista.com> wrote:
On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 11:59:39PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
Becky & Kumar,
Considering these fixups, would it be advisable for the dma
functions
to climb up the dev->parent linkage when dma_ops are NULL?
pcm->dev->parent doesn't point to the proper device, so
this won't work.
What does it point to then? IIUC, following the ->parent links should
eventually get to a struct device that represents the platform or
of_platform device for purposes of power management.
BTW, I'm not NAKing your patch. The patch looks fine to me.
g.
No, I think we should just fix drivers. There aren't that many SoC
drivers and once they are fixed this will resolve itself.
- k
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
