On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:49:29PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > Ben, > > Can you ACK this patch? Or even take it in your tree?
Benjamin, have you had a chance to look into this? Sam, could you also take a look? Thanks! > On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 19:44 +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > > This patch introduces ARCH_HAS_NORMAL_FRAME_POINTERS Kconfig symbol. > > When defined, the top level Makefile won't add -fno-omit-frame-pointer > > cflag (the flag is useless in PowerPC kernels, and also makes gcc > > generate wrong code). > > > > Also move ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS's help text. > > > > Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avoront...@ru.mvista.com> > > --- > > Makefile | 7 +++++-- > > arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 1 + > > lib/Kconfig.debug | 16 ++++++++++------ > > 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile > > index 46c04c5..bf41b05 100644 > > --- a/Makefile > > +++ b/Makefile > > @@ -538,9 +538,12 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, > > -fno-stack-protector) > > endif > > > > ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER > > -KBUILD_CFLAGS += -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-calls > > + KBUILD_CFLAGS += -fno-optimize-sibling-calls > > + ifndef ARCH_HAS_NORMAL_FRAME_POINTERS > > + KBUILD_CFLAGS += -fno-omit-frame-pointer > > + endif > > else > > -KBUILD_CFLAGS += -fomit-frame-pointer > > + KBUILD_CFLAGS += -fomit-frame-pointer > > endif > > > > ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig > > index 97f9a64..4587e66 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig > > @@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ config PPC > > select HAVE_FUNCTION_TRACER > > select HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER > > select ARCH_WANT_OPTIONAL_GPIOLIB > > + select ARCH_HAS_NORMAL_FRAME_POINTERS > > select HAVE_IDE > > select HAVE_IOREMAP_PROT > > select HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS > > diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug > > index 4b63b6b..fc8cd1f 100644 > > --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug > > +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug > > @@ -661,20 +661,24 @@ config DEBUG_NOTIFIERS > > This is a relatively cheap check but if you care about maximum > > performance, say N. > > > > -# > > -# Select this config option from the architecture Kconfig, if it > > -# it is preferred to always offer frame pointers as a config > > -# option on the architecture (regardless of KERNEL_DEBUG): > > -# > > config ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS > > bool > > help > > + Select this config option from the architecture Kconfig, if it > > + it is preferred to always offer frame pointers as a config > > + option on the architecture (regardless of KERNEL_DEBUG). > > + > > +config ARCH_HAS_NORMAL_FRAME_POINTERS > > + bool > > + help > > + Architectures should select this symbol if their ABI implies > > + having a frame pointer. > > > > config FRAME_POINTER > > bool "Compile the kernel with frame pointers" > > depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && \ > > (CRIS || M68K || M68KNOMMU || FRV || UML || S390 || \ > > - AVR32 || SUPERH || BLACKFIN || MN10300) || \ > > + AVR32 || SUPERH || BLACKFIN || MN10300 || PPC) || \ > > ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS > > default y if (DEBUG_INFO && UML) || ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS > > help > -- Anton Vorontsov email: cbouatmai...@gmail.com irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2 _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
