pku....@gmail.com wrote on 27/03/2009 11:50:09:
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 8:54 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
> <joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se> wrote:
> > Also set NAPI weight to 64 as this is a common value.
> > This will make the system alot more responsive while
> > ping flooding the ucc_geth ethernet interaface.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se>
> > ---
> > /* Errors and other events */
> > if (ucce & UCCE_OTHER) {
> > if (ucce & UCC_GETH_UCCE_BSY)
> > @@ -3733,7 +3725,7 @@ static int ucc_geth_probe(struct of_device*
ofdev, const struct of_device_id *ma
> > dev->netdev_ops = &ucc_geth_netdev_ops;
> > dev->watchdog_timeo = TX_TIMEOUT;
> > INIT_WORK(&ugeth->timeout_work, ucc_geth_timeout_work);
> > - netif_napi_add(dev, &ugeth->napi, ucc_geth_poll,
UCC_GETH_DEV_WEIGHT);
> > + netif_napi_add(dev, &ugeth->napi, ucc_geth_poll, 64);
>
> It doesn't make sense to have larger napi budget than the size of RX
> BD ring. You can't have more BDs than RX_BD_RING_LEN in backlog for
> napi_poll to process. Increase the RX_BD_RING_LEN if you want to
> increase UCC_GETH_DEV_WEIGHT. However please also provide the
> performance comparison for this kind of change. Thanks
Bring it up with David Miller. After my initial attempt to just increase
weight somewhat, he requested that I hardcoded it to 64. Just read the
whole thread.
If I don't increase weight somewhat, ping -f -l 3 almost halts the board.
Logging
in takes forever. These are my "performance numbers".
weight theory:
Before the drivers gets to the end of a full BD ring, new pkgs arrives so
that
even if the DB ring is only 16, the driver wants to process 17 or more
pkgs.
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
