On Wed 2009-03-25 11:31:57, Scott Wood wrote:
> Pavel Machek wrote:
>>> Pavel, what's the preferred way for current PM sub-system?
>>
>> If you have single sleep state, use "mem" > /sys/power/state.
>>
>> If you have two, use mem and standby. Do you have more?
>
> Some of our chips have two, and some have one. However, the sleep state
> of the chips that have only one is the same as the "standby" state of
> the chips that have two, not the "mem" state. Accepting "mem" and
> only
Ok, I guess it makes sense to use "standby" for the single sleep
state, then... It is not really a big deal, anyway.
> "mem" for the one-state chip seems like the most confusing of the
> options discussed. There would be no consistent way for userspace to
> request the milder suspend state.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
