Anton Vorontsov wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 03:31:29PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:23:44PM +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
I don't see any better solution, should I just leave the core1's
mdio node intact?
Ah. We also could change compatible entry to "fsl,gianfar-slave".
This will prevent gianfar MAC driver to probe on core1.
...and also prevent it from probing the children, unless simple-bus is
specified, or Linux is given special knowledge of the
"fsl,gianfar-slave" name.
Yup. Do you see any problem with this?
Yes, the mdio node would not get probed. Why put it in the device tree
at all then?
-Scott
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
