Anton Vorontsov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 11:57:46AM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 07:02:01PM +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
m...@24520 {
@@ -226,6 +244,8 @@
interrupt-parent = <&ipic>;
tbi-handle = <&tbi0>;
phy-handle = <&phy2>;
+ sleep = <&pmc 0xc0000000>;
+ fsl,magic-packet;
};
Note that this makes it look to the kernel like enet0 can be put to sleep
without putting the mdio (which is shared with enet1) to sleep. This is
why I moved mdio under the ethernet node on 8313erdb.
And that isn't absolutely correct either, since enet1 depends on
net0... If enet0's mdio goes into sleep mode before enet1, then
enet1 will fail to send power-down command to its PHY...
But the kernel knows that enet1 depends on mdio0. Getting the kernel to
act on that knowledge isn't the device tree's problem.
-Scott
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
