On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 05:31:34PM +0530, Vijay Nikam wrote: > > Don't specify this explicitly. Please base new development off of the > > device tree that is in upstream Linux, not the very old tree in your BSP. > > May I know the reason why I should not specify it explicitly ? ? ?
Because dtc will generate phandles automatically when you reference the node with the & operator. > Also what would be the problem if I do in the same way as it is given > in BSP mpc8313erdb.dts ? ? ? Do you want your changes to ever make it into the upstream kernel? > And should I use gpio-controller as a gpio device node ? ? ? Yes, the node should label itself as a gpio controller. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
