On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Matt Sealey <m...@genesi-usa.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Grant Likely <grant.lik...@secretlab.ca> > wrote: >> From: Grant Likely <grant.lik...@secretlab.ca> >> >> This patch updates the mpc5200 binding documentation to match >> actual usage conventions, to remove incorrect information, and >> to remove topics which are more thoroughly described elsewhere. >> >> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.lik...@secretlab.ca> >> CC: devtree-disc...@ozlabs.org >> CC: Wolfram Sang <w.s...@pengutronix.de> >> --- >> +It is *strongly* recommended that 5200B device trees follow this convention >> +(instead of only listing the base mpc5200 item). >> + >> +ie. ethernet on mpc5200: compatible = "fsl,mpc5200-ethernet"; >> + ethernet on mpc5200b: compatible = "fsl,mpc5200b-ethernet", >> + "fsl,mpc5200-ethernet"; > > snip > >> +ethernet@<addr> fsl,mpc5200-fec MPC5200 ethernet device > > snip > >> +fsl,mpc5200-fec nodes >> +--------------------- >> +The FEC node can specify one of the following properties to configure >> +the MII link: > > > Is it fec or ethernet? Obviously the first one is an example only but > it should least reflect real life..
Good catch. It should be -fec. Fixed. g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
