On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 21:43 -0800, Trent Piepho wrote: > On Sun, 11 Jan 2009, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 04:31 -0800, Trent Piepho wrote: > > > The LED tree makes more sense for what's left I think. There was a > > > openfirmware gpio patch, but that's already gone in. What's left only > > > touches led files and the device tree binding docs. > > > > > > AFAIK, there were no objections to the patches left. > > > > Ok, these are now queued in the LED tree: > > > > http://git.o-hand.com/cgit.cgi/linux-rpurdie-leds/log/ > > > > I did merge the last three patches in one and make some changes to deal > > with some other outstanding issues. Let me know ASAP if there are any > > problems. > > Since the last patch looks like it's just my three patches folded into one, > shouldn't I be listed as the author and the primary signed off by?
I made changes other than just merging the three together (the syspend/resume change and the bitfield parts in leds.h) so putting you as signed off by/authorship would not have been "correct" and I credited you in the commit message instead. I wanted to get the missing patches queued ASAP so I went with the way that does fit in the rules as you'd not have been happy if a modified patch was attributed to you. I'll put you as author and a signoff if you confirm thats acceptable. Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
