On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 09:22:02AM -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> This patch adds a dummy GPIO driver, which is useful for SPI devices
> that do not have a physical chip select.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Steven A. Falco <sfa...@harris.com>
> ---
> The SPI subsystem requires a chip-select for each connected slave
> device.  I have a custom board with an Atmel "co-processor".  This part
> is reprogrammed via SPI, so it needs a chip select to satisfy the SPI
> subsystem, but my hardware does not have a physical CS connected.
> 
> I could waste a "no-connect" GPIO pin, but I'd rather not.  So, I've
> written a dummy GPIO driver, which behaves exactly like a real GPIO
> device, but with no underlying hardware.  This could also be useful
> as a template for real GPIO drivers.
> 
> I use the following dts entry:
> 
>       GPIO3: du...@ef500000 {
>               compatible = "linux,dummy-gpio";
>               reg = <ef500000 1>;
>               gpio-controller;
>               #gpio-cells = <2>;
>       };

This is not sane.  I can see reasons it might be useful to have a
dummy gpio driver within the kernel, but since this doesn't represent
any real hardware, it should not appear in the device tree.

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to