On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 21:57:12 -1000
"Mitch Bradley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One address/size cell isn't enough for the next generation of NAND
> FLASH chips.
>
I am no dts expert, but I thought I could put:
nand {
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
in my dts and you could put:
nand {
#address-cells = <2>;
#size-cells = <2>;
and, assuming we specified the reg entry right, everything would just
work. Is that assumption wrong?
And if the assumption is true, should I make a note in the doc that you
can make the address and size bigger?
Cheers,
Sean
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
