The behavior in careful_allocation() really confused me
at first.  Add a comment to hopefully make it easier
on the next doofus that looks at it.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---

 linux-2.6.git-dave/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c |   12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff -puN arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c~cleanup-careful_allocation4 
arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
--- linux-2.6.git/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c~cleanup-careful_allocation4    
2008-12-09 10:16:05.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6.git-dave/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c   2008-12-09 10:16:05.000000000 
-0800
@@ -840,8 +840,16 @@ static void __init *careful_allocation(i
                      size, nid);
 
        /*
-        * If the memory came from a previously allocated node, we must
-        * retry with the bootmem allocator.
+        * We initialize the nodes in numeric order: 0, 1, 2...
+        * and hand over control from the LMB allocator to the
+        * bootmem allocator.  If this function is called for
+        * node 5, then we know that all nodes <5 are using the
+        * bootmem allocator instead of the LMB allocator.
+        *
+        * So, check the nid from which this allocation came
+        * and double check to see if we need to use bootmem
+        * instead of the LMB.  We don't free the LMB memory
+        * since it would be useless.
         */
        new_nid = early_pfn_to_nid(ret >> PAGE_SHIFT);
        if (new_nid < nid) {
_
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to