On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Satya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ben, > Look here: http://www-unix.mcs.anl.gov/zeptoos/hugepages/ > > thanks, > ./satya > > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 13:38 -0500, Satya wrote: >> > hello, >> > I am trying to implement hugetlbfs on the IBM Bluegene/L IO node >> > (ppc440) and I have a big problem as well as a few questions to ask >> > the group. I patched a 2.6.21.6 linux kernel (manually) with Edi >> > Shmueli's hugetlbfs implementation (found here: >> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=8427) for this. I did >> > have to make slight changes (described at the end) to make it work. >> > My test program is a shortened version of a sys v shared memory >> > example described in Documentation/vm/hugetlbpage.txt >> >> Hi ! >> >> The patchwork link unfortunately didn't survive the transition to >> patchwork 2. >> >> Do you know what's the status of Hugetlb support for 44x ? Is there any >> plan to release that for upstream inclusion ? >> >> Cheers, >> Ben. >> >> >>
whoops, sorry for top-posting. Here is a patch that worked at that time: http://www-unix.mcs.anl.gov/zeptoos/hugepages/hugetlbpage_44x.patch I didn't follow up after this to get it merged upstream. Also I don't know if hugetlb core has changed to deal with PTEs in high memory. ./satya
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
