On Thu, 25 Jun 2026 16:41:58 -0700
Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]> wrote:


> The following diff resolves it for me, should I send it as a separate
> patch or do you want to just fold it in with a note?
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/lockdep.h b/include/linux/lockdep.h
> index 621566345406..2301a701ffbb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/lockdep.h
> +++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>  #ifndef __LINUX_LOCKDEP_H
>  #define __LINUX_LOCKDEP_H
>  
> +#include <linux/instruction_pointer.h>

Ah, so the reason for this breakage is because lockdep was relying on
instruction_pointer.h, that just happened to be included in kernel.h
via trace_printk.h.

This is a separate issue, so it should be a separate patch. I'll add it
as patch 1 of this series.

Can you send me the config you used. This didn't trigger in my tests.

Thanks,

-- Steve



>  #include <linux/lockdep_types.h>
>  #include <linux/smp.h>
>  #include <asm/percpu.h>


Reply via email to