On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 10:58:10PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2026 at 07:10:36AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > +#define __DO_XOR_BLOCKS(_name, _handle1, _handle2, _handle3, _handle4)     
> > \
> > +void                                                               \
> > +xor_gen_##_name(void *dest, void **srcs, unsigned int src_cnt,             
> > \
> > +           unsigned int bytes)                                     \
> > +{                                                                  \
> > +   unsigned int src_off = 0;                                       \
> > +                                                                   \
> > +   while (src_cnt > 0) {                                           \
> > +           unsigned int this_cnt = min(src_cnt, 4);                \
> > +           unsigned long *p1 = (unsigned long *)srcs[src_off];     \
> > +           unsigned long *p2 = (unsigned long *)srcs[src_off + 1]; \
> > +           unsigned long *p3 = (unsigned long *)srcs[src_off + 2]; \
> > +           unsigned long *p4 = (unsigned long *)srcs[src_off + 3]; \
> 
> This reads out of bounds if src_cnt isn't a multiple of 4.

Assuming the compiler doesn't do the obvious optimization and
drop it, but yes, should be easy enough to avoid this.


Reply via email to