Hi Christophe.

No. With this patch there will not be any performance difference.
All it does is, instead of using mftb uses sched_clock at those places.


For the record, I did some benchmark test with tools/testing/selftests/ powerpc/benchmarks/null_syscall on powerpc 885 microcontroller:

Without your proposed patch:

root@vgoip:~# ./null_syscall
    2729.98 ns     360.36 cycles

With your proposed patch below:

root@vgoip:~# ./null_syscall
    3370.80 ns     444.95 cycles

So as expected it is a huge regression, almost 25% more time to run the syscall.

Christophe




Got it. My bad  in assuming it may not happen multiple before vtime_flush.

Btw, can you try latest vtime_reset patch? It shouldn't make any difference.
I tried perf bench syscall basic, and ./null_syscall.
I don't any difference for vtime_reset patch.

Reply via email to