On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 23:43 +0200, Sebastian Siewior wrote: > * Milton Miller | 2008-09-23 20:46:18 [-0500]: > > >On Wed Sep 24 at about 06:38:57 EST in 2008, Sebastian Siewior wrote: > >> My mylinux binary incl. bss is ~5 MiB without bss less than 4 MiB. > >> Therefore I though that I could replace ei.memsize with ei.loadsize. It > >> didn't work. I'm not sure why it did not work but I guess that the > >> memset() of bss in the initial kernel code overwrote the cuimage code > >> which is required for some reason. Maybe some device-tree callbacks. > > > >probably because the bss extended beyond the cuboot _end to include > >where your device tree was copied (just a malloc and we start > >simple_malloc at the boot _end on most platforms). > > Right, the bss section went past _dtb_start, moving the device tree > helps. > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Siewior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please repost in correct form, that is with the changeset comment. Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
