On 1/15/26 13:21, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 10:19:56AM +0100, David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) wrote:Let's not piggy-back on the existing lock and use a separate lock for the huge page list. Now that we use a separate lock, there is no need to disable interrupts, so use the non-irqsave variants.Why can we avoid disabling interrupts in this case?
It's a leftover from using the old lock that required this. Thanks! -- Cheers David
