On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 11:50:59AM +0530, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
> This is helper patch which could be used to set the range of CPUs as
> paravirt. One could make use of this for quick testing of this infra
> instead of writing arch specific code.
> 
> This is currently not meant be merged, since paravirt sysfs file is meant
> to be Read-Only.
> 
> echo 100-200,600-700 >  /sys/devices/system/cpu/paravirt
> cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/paravirt
> 100-200,600-700
> 
> echo > /sys/devices/system/cpu/paravirt
> cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/paravirt
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/base/cpu.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/cpu.c b/drivers/base/cpu.c
> index 59ceae217b22..043e4f4ce1a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/cpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/cpu.c
> @@ -375,12 +375,57 @@ static int cpu_uevent(const struct device *dev, struct 
> kobj_uevent_env *env)
>  #endif
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
> +static ssize_t store_paravirt_cpus(struct device *dev,
> +                                struct device_attribute *attr,
> +                                const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> +     cpumask_var_t temp_mask;
> +     int retval = 0;
> +
> +     if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&temp_mask, GFP_KERNEL))
> +             return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +     retval = cpulist_parse(buf, temp_mask);
> +     if (retval)
> +             goto free_mask;
> +
> +     /* ALL cpus can't be marked as paravirt */
> +     if (cpumask_equal(temp_mask, cpu_online_mask)) {
> +             retval = -EINVAL;
> +             goto free_mask;
> +     }
> +     if (cpumask_weight(temp_mask) > num_online_cpus()) {
> +             retval = -EINVAL;
> +             goto free_mask;
> +     }
> +
> +     /* No more paravirt cpus */
> +     if (cpumask_empty(temp_mask)) {
> +             cpumask_copy((struct cpumask *)&__cpu_paravirt_mask, temp_mask);
> +     } else {
> +             cpumask_copy((struct cpumask *)&__cpu_paravirt_mask, temp_mask);
> +
> +             /* Enable tick on nohz_full cpu */
> +             int cpu;
> +             for_each_cpu(cpu, temp_mask) {
> +                     if (tick_nohz_full_cpu(cpu))
> +                             tick_nohz_dep_set_cpu(cpu, TICK_DEP_BIT_SCHED);
> +             }
> +     }
> +
> +     retval = count;
> +
> +free_mask:
> +     free_cpumask_var(temp_mask);
> +     return retval;
> +}
> +
>  static ssize_t print_paravirt_cpus(struct device *dev,
>                                  struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>  {
>       return sysfs_emit(buf, "%*pbl\n", cpumask_pr_args(cpu_paravirt_mask));
>  }
> -static DEVICE_ATTR(paravirt, 0444, print_paravirt_cpus, NULL);
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(paravirt, 0644, print_paravirt_cpus, store_paravirt_cpus);

DEVICE_ATTR_RW()?

And where is the documentation update for this sysfs file change?

>  #endif
>  
>  const struct bus_type cpu_subsys = {
> @@ -675,7 +720,6 @@ static void __init cpu_register_vulnerabilities(void)
>               put_device(dev);
>       }
>  }
> -
>  #else

Why is this change needed?

thanks,

greg k-h

Reply via email to