> Victor, while at it, can you do a fixup patch on top of it that guards > the new feature with a Kconfig option like some of the other ones so > that the code for it doesn't get compiled in when building, for example. > for 405GP only ? > > The trick is to have the option not be part of the possible mask, so > that the compiler optimises out the feature tests as if (0) (gcc > nowadays is supposedly smart enough to rip off the code when it finds > such constructs).
Hi Ben, Can you give an example of what you are asking for? I am not sure if I understand your request. Thanks, Victor Gallardo
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev