On Thu, 2025-10-02 at 16:10 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > How is the approach to "keep it atomic" working out so far? ;) > > The kernel isn't exactly developed in secret. It's also not hard at all > to, say, once a week to peek at linux-next and do a lore search (or use > lei) if anyone is desperately worried about the ~50 lines per > architecture going out of sync.
With all due respect, the lack of action on this patchset is not at all due to its scope, but purely due to the throwing-spaghetti-at-the-wall approach to code review that you yourself just got done pointing out. Addressing the latter problem would thereby also address the former.
