Grant Likely wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 09:02:56AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
For example:
/ {
model = "pengutronix,super-sexy-board";
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
super-sexy-board,watchdog-gpio = <&gpio_simple 19 0>;
...
}
Why as a property of the root node, and not as a node with a very
specific compatible property?
Because the root node is the only logical board-level node we have
right now. However, I'm not deeply committed to this approach. The
only question I have about putting it in another node is choosing the
parent node. I don't think it fits to make it a child of the SoC node
or any other bus node.
A child of the gpio controller node seems most logical, though a child
of the root node would be OK. It was the freefloating property that
struck me as a little odd.
-Scott
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
