On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 07:55:01PM +0530, Srinivasa Ds wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 September 2008 17:00:01 Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > > applied to [the new topic] tip/core/signal, thanks Srinivasa! There
> > > are some other pending x86 signal changes already, so i based
> > > tip/core/signal on tip/x86/signal.
> >
> > -tip testing found the following build error with the attached config:
> >
>
> Ingo, Reproduced build break issue with your config on tip tree. It was a
> costly overlook
> to miss one header file. I included it in this patch and tested it out.
>
>
> Currently a SIGTRAP can denote any one of below reasons.
> - Breakpoint hit
> - H/W debug register hit
> - Single step
> - Signal sent through kill() or rasie()
Typo: s/rasie/raise/
No strong opinion about the patch, but more info is usually better.
Regards,
Gabriel
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
