On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 12:05 PM Christophe Leroy <christophe.le...@csgroup.eu> wrote: > > > > Le 23/06/2025 à 11:55, Bartosz Golaszewski a écrit : > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 11:54 AM Christophe Leroy > > <christophe.le...@csgroup.eu> wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> > >> Le 23/06/2025 à 09:33, Bartosz Golaszewski a écrit : > >>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 2:38 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <b...@bgdev.pl> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Commit 98ce1eb1fd87e ("gpiolib: introduce gpio_chip setters that return > >>>> values") added new line setter callbacks to struct gpio_chip. They allow > >>>> to indicate failures to callers. We're in the process of converting all > >>>> GPIO controllers to using them before removing the old ones. This series > >>>> converts all GPIO chips implemented under drivers/soc/. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszew...@linaro.org> > >>>> --- > >>>> Bartosz Golaszewski (2): > >>>> soc: fsl: qe: use new GPIO line value setter callbacks > >>>> soc: renesas: pwc-rzv2m: use new GPIO line value setter callbacks > >>>> > >>>> drivers/soc/fsl/qe/gpio.c | 6 ++++-- > >>>> drivers/soc/renesas/pwc-rzv2m.c | 8 +++++--- > >>>> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > >>>> --- > >>>> base-commit: 19272b37aa4f83ca52bdf9c16d5d81bdd1354494 > >>>> change-id: 20250523-gpiochip-set-rv-soc-14e1d9414f70 > >>>> > >>>> Best regards, > >>>> -- > >>>> Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszew...@linaro.org> > >>>> > >>> > >>> I see Geert queued patch 2/2, who would take patch 1/2? > >> > >> > >> It is in my pipe for v6.17 but if someone else wants to take it I can > >> Ack it instead. > >> > >> Christophe > > > > No, that's alright, I just didn't get any notification nor is it in > > linux-next yet. > > Don't worry, it is not lost, see > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?series=&submitter=&state=&q=&archive=&delegate=61610
Hi, This is still not in linux-next and the status on patchwork didn't change. This will be the last remaining patch not under drivers/gpio/ that's needed to complete this rework by the next cycle. Would you mind just Acking it and I can take it through the GPIO tree? Bart