On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 03:46:30PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarz...@redhat.com>
> 
> This driver does not support interrupts, and receiving the response is
> synchronous with sending the command.
> 
> Enable synchronous send() with TPM_CHIP_FLAG_SYNC, which implies that
> ->send() already fills the provided buffer with a response, and ->recv()
> is not implemented.
> 
> Keep using the same pre-allocated buffer to avoid having to allocate
> it for each command. We need the buffer to have the header required by
> the SVSM protocol and the command contiguous in memory.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarz...@redhat.com>
> ---
> v5:
> - changed order and parameter names to match tpm_try_transmit() [Jarkko]
> v4:
> - reworked commit description [Jarkko]
> ---
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_svsm.c | 27 +++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_svsm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_svsm.c
> index 0847cbf450b4..f5ba0f64850b 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_svsm.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_svsm.c
> @@ -26,37 +26,31 @@ struct tpm_svsm_priv {
>  };
>  
>  static int tpm_svsm_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t bufsiz,
> -                      size_t len)
> +                      size_t cmd_len)
>  {
>       struct tpm_svsm_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
>       int ret;
>  
> -     ret = svsm_vtpm_cmd_request_fill(priv->buffer, 0, buf, len);
> +     ret = svsm_vtpm_cmd_request_fill(priv->buffer, 0, buf, cmd_len);
>       if (ret)
>               return ret;
>  
>       /*
>        * The SVSM call uses the same buffer for the command and for the
> -      * response, so after this call, the buffer will contain the response
> -      * that can be used by .recv() op.
> +      * response, so after this call, the buffer will contain the response.
> +      *
> +      * Note: we have to use an internal buffer because the device in SVSM
> +      * expects the svsm_vtpm header + data to be physically contiguous.
>        */
> -     return snp_svsm_vtpm_send_command(priv->buffer);
> -}
> -
> -static int tpm_svsm_recv(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t len)
> -{
> -     struct tpm_svsm_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
> +     ret = snp_svsm_vtpm_send_command(priv->buffer);
> +     if (ret)
> +             return ret;
>  
> -     /*
> -      * The internal buffer contains the response after we send the command
> -      * to SVSM.
> -      */
> -     return svsm_vtpm_cmd_response_parse(priv->buffer, buf, len);
> +     return svsm_vtpm_cmd_response_parse(priv->buffer, buf, bufsiz);
>  }
>  
>  static struct tpm_class_ops tpm_chip_ops = {
>       .flags = TPM_OPS_AUTO_STARTUP,
> -     .recv = tpm_svsm_recv,
>       .send = tpm_svsm_send,
>  };
>  
> @@ -85,6 +79,7 @@ static int __init tpm_svsm_probe(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>  
>       dev_set_drvdata(&chip->dev, priv);
>  
> +     chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_SYNC;
>       err = tpm2_probe(chip);
>       if (err)
>               return err;
> -- 
> 2.49.0
> 
> 

I can pick this for 6.16.

BR, Jarkko

BR, Jarkko

Reply via email to