On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 07:38:49PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > > Nothing requires that the export formats be consistent, but also the fact that > padlock-sha uses a weird format in the first place is an artificial problem > that > you introduced just a couple weeks ago. And even if we *must* use the same > format as padlock-sha, that can be done by using your crypto_sha256_export_lib > and crypto_sha256_import_lib, without all your other changes.
That was just the reason of why I can't take your first patch as is and then add my changes as incremental patches. I do still want to bypass the partial block handling in lib/crypto. But alright I will do it like this: Patch 1 is just your existing patch + my export/import functions. Then I will add the rest of my changes as incremental patches. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
