Hi Madhavan,

On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 02:11:29PM +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
> Build break was reported in the powerpc mailing list for next-20250218 with 
> below errors
> 
> make[1]: Nothing to be done for 'all'.
> BUILD_TARGET=/root/venkat/linux-next/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/mm; 
> mkdir -p $BUILD_TARGET; make OUTPUT=$BUILD_TARGET -k -C mm all
>   CC       pkey_exec_prot
> In file included from pkey_exec_prot.c:18:
> /root/venkat/linux-next/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/include/pkeys.h: In 
> function ‘pkeys_unsupported’:
> /root/venkat/linux-next/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/include/pkeys.h:96:34:
>  error: ‘PKEY_UNRESTRICTED’ undeclared (first use in this function)
>    96 |         pkey = sys_pkey_alloc(0, PKEY_UNRESTRICTED);
>       |                                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250113170619.484698-2-yury.khrusta...@arm.com/ 
> patchset
> has been queued to arm64/for-next/pkey_unrestricted which is causing a build 
> break
> in the selftest/powerpc builds.
> 
> Commit 6d61527d931ba ("mm/pkey: Add PKEY_UNRESTRICTED macro") added a macro
> PKEY_UNRESTRICTED to handle implicit literal value of 0x0 (which is 
> "unrestricted").
> Add the same to selftest/powerpc/pkeys.h to fix the reported build break.
> 
> Reported-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venka...@linux.ibm.com>
> Closes: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/3267ea6e-5a1a-4752-96ef-8351c912d...@linux.ibm.com/T/
> Tested-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venka...@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <ma...@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> Catalin, can you take this fix via arm64/for-next/pkey_unrestricted?
> Patch applies clean on top of arm64/for-next/pkey_unrestricted

I'll take it, sorry for the break. I did not realise powerpc duplicates
those definitions.

-- 
Catalin

Reply via email to