Hi Haren, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on powerpc/next] [also build test WARNING on powerpc/fixes linus/master v6.14-rc6] [cannot apply to next-20250307] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Haren-Myneni/powerpc-pseries-Define-common-functions-for-RTAS-sequence-calls/20250310-054319 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250309213916.762116-4-haren%40linux.ibm.com patch subject: [PATCH v7 3/7] powerpc/pseries: Add papr-indices char driver for ibm,get-indices config: powerpc64-randconfig-r072-20250311 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250311/202503111710.tspk3snj-...@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 21.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project e15545cad8297ec7555f26e5ae74a9f0511203e7) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250311/202503111710.tspk3snj-...@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <l...@intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202503111710.tspk3snj-...@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr-indices.c:124: warning: Function >> parameter or struct member 'seq' not described in 'indices_sequence_begin' vim +124 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr-indices.c 110 111 /* 112 * Internal indices sequence APIs. A sequence is a series of calls to 113 * ibm,get-indices for a given location code. The sequence ends when 114 * an error is encountered or all indices for the input has been 115 * returned. 116 */ 117 118 /** 119 * indices_sequence_begin() - Begin a indices retrieval sequence. 120 * 121 * Context: May sleep. 122 */ 123 static void indices_sequence_begin(struct papr_rtas_sequence *seq) > 124 { 125 struct rtas_get_indices_params *param; 126 127 param = (struct rtas_get_indices_params *)seq->params; 128 /* 129 * We could allocate the work area before acquiring the 130 * function lock, but that would allow concurrent requests to 131 * exhaust the limited work area pool for no benefit. So 132 * allocate the work area under the lock. 133 */ 134 mutex_lock(&rtas_ibm_get_indices_lock); 135 param->work_area = rtas_work_area_alloc(RTAS_GET_INDICES_BUF_SIZE); 136 param->next = 1; 137 param->status = 0; 138 } 139 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
