I was able to reproduce the issue without this patch.
Applied this patch on next-20250227 kernel and tested the patch and
issue is fixed.
Please add below tag.
Tested-By: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venka...@linux.ibm.com>
On 04/03/25 9:11 pm, Athira Rajeev wrote:
In disasm_line__parse_powerpc() , return code from function
disasm_line__parse() is ignored. This will result in bad results
if the disasm_line__parse fails to disasm the line. Use
the return code to fix this.
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atraj...@linux.ibm.com>
---
tools/perf/util/disasm.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/disasm.c b/tools/perf/util/disasm.c
index a53e8c4e5bca..8f0eb56c6fc6 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/disasm.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/disasm.c
@@ -976,6 +976,7 @@ static int disasm_line__parse_powerpc(struct disasm_line
*dl, struct annotate_ar
char *tmp_raw_insn, *name_raw_insn = skip_spaces(line);
char *name = skip_spaces(name_raw_insn + RAW_BYTES);
int disasm = 0;
+ int ret = 0;
if (args->options->disassembler_used)
disasm = 1;
@@ -984,7 +985,7 @@ static int disasm_line__parse_powerpc(struct disasm_line
*dl, struct annotate_ar
return -1;
if (disasm)
- disasm_line__parse(name, namep, rawp);
+ ret = disasm_line__parse(name, namep, rawp);
else
*namep = "";
@@ -998,7 +999,7 @@ static int disasm_line__parse_powerpc(struct disasm_line *dl, struct annotate_ar
if (disasm)
dl->raw.raw_insn = be32_to_cpu(dl->raw.raw_insn);
- return 0;
+ return ret;
}
static void annotation_line__init(struct annotation_line *al,
