On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 10:10:16PM +0800, Yicong Yang wrote:
> From: Yicong Yang <yangyic...@hisilicon.com>
>
> On building the topology from the devicetree, we've already
> gotten the SMT thread number of each core. Update the largest
> SMT thread number and enable the SMT control by the end of
> topology parsing.
>
> The core's SMT control provides two interface to the users [1]:
> 1) enable/disable SMT by writing on/off
> 2) enable/disable SMT by writing thread number 1/max_thread_number
>
> If a system have more than one SMT thread number the 2) may
> not handle it well, since there're multiple thread numbers in the
> system and 2) only accept 1/max_thread_number. So issue a warning
> to notify the users if such system detected.
>
> [1]
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu#n542
>
> Signed-off-by: Yicong Yang <yangyic...@hisilicon.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> index 3ebe77566788..23f425a9d77a 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> #include <linux/cleanup.h>
> #include <linux/cpu.h>
> #include <linux/cpufreq.h>
> +#include <linux/cpu_smt.h>
> #include <linux/device.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> @@ -506,6 +507,10 @@ core_initcall(free_raw_capacity);
> #endif
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_ARM64) || defined(CONFIG_RISCV)
> +
> +/* Maximum SMT thread number detected used to enable the SMT control */
> +static unsigned int max_smt_thread_num;
> +
> /*
> * This function returns the logic cpu number of the node.
> * There are basically three kinds of return values:
> @@ -565,6 +570,16 @@ static int __init parse_core(struct device_node *core,
> int package_id,
> i++;
> } while (1);
>
> + /*
> + * If max_smt_thread_num has been initialized and doesn't match
> + * the thread number of this entry, then the system has
> + * heterogeneous SMT topology.
> + */
> + if (max_smt_thread_num && max_smt_thread_num != i)
> + pr_warn_once("Heterogeneous SMT topology is partly supported by
> SMT control\n");
> +
May be we need to make it more conditional as we may have to support
systems with few cores that are single threaded ? I think Dietmar's
comment is about that.
> + max_smt_thread_num = max_t(unsigned int, max_smt_thread_num, i);
> +
> cpu = get_cpu_for_node(core);
> if (cpu >= 0) {
> if (!leaf) {
> @@ -677,6 +692,18 @@ static int __init parse_socket(struct device_node
> *socket)
> if (!has_socket)
> ret = parse_cluster(socket, 0, -1, 0);
>
> + /*
> + * Notify the CPU framework of the SMT support. Initialize the
> + * max_smt_thread_num to 1 if no SMT support detected or failed
> + * to parse the topology. A thread number of 1 can be handled by
> + * the framework so we don't need to check max_smt_thread_num to
> + * see we support SMT or not.
> + */
> + if (!max_smt_thread_num || ret)
> + max_smt_thread_num = 1;
> +
For the failed parsing of topology, reset_cpu_topology() gets called.
I suggest resetting max_smt_thread_num to 1 belongs there.
And if you start with max_smt_thread_num, we don't need to update it to
1 explicitly here. So I would like to get rid of above check completely.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
