On 2/27/25 01:23, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 05:54:04PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptdump.h 
>> b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptdump.h
>> index 6cf4aae05219..b2931d1ae0fb 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptdump.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptdump.h
>> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
>>  
>>  #include <linux/ptdump.h>
>>  
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_PTDUMP_CORE
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PTDUMP
> 
> Do we need this #ifdef at all? I haven't tried but usually, if the
> feature is not enabled, the header file on its own should be harmless.

With or without the #ifdef CONFIG_PTDUMP in place here, this does not cause
any build warnings even without CONFIG_PTDUMP enabled. But dropping #ifdef
while renaming the config option itself, might have caused unrelated code
churn. So probably if required we could drop this later on.

> 
> For arm64:
> 
> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com>

Reply via email to