Le 24/02/2025 à 17:25, Peter Zijlstra a écrit :
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 02:20:41PM +0530, Sathvika Vasireddy wrote:
@@ -1625,6 +1626,11 @@ static int add_call_destinations(struct objtool_file
*file)
reloc = insn_reloc(file, insn);
if (!reloc) {
dest_off = arch_jump_destination(insn);
+
+ next_insn = next_insn_same_func(file, insn);
+ if (next_insn && dest_off == next_insn->offset)
+ continue;
+
This won't work on x86, where an intra-function call is converted to a
stack-modifying JUMP. So this should probably be checked in an
arch-specific function.
Thanks for letting me know, I'll introduce arch_skip_call_warning() to
handle architecture specific cases in the next patch I send.
Can't you detect this pattern in decode and simpy not emit the call
instruction?
Yes we can, simply do:
diff --git a/tools/objtool/arch/powerpc/decode.c
b/tools/objtool/arch/powerpc/decode.c
index 53b55690f320..4f9b1715caf1 100644
--- a/tools/objtool/arch/powerpc/decode.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/arch/powerpc/decode.c
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ int arch_decode_instruction(struct objtool_file *file,
const struct section *sec
switch (opcode) {
case 18: /* b[l][a] */
- if ((ins & 3) == 1) /* bl */
+ if ((ins & 3) == 1 && ins != 0x48000005) /* bl but not bl .+4*/
typ = INSN_CALL;
imm = ins & 0x3fffffc;