Le 24/02/2025 à 17:25, Peter Zijlstra a écrit :
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 02:20:41PM +0530, Sathvika Vasireddy wrote:

@@ -1625,6 +1626,11 @@ static int add_call_destinations(struct objtool_file 
*file)
                reloc = insn_reloc(file, insn);
                if (!reloc) {
                        dest_off = arch_jump_destination(insn);
+
+                       next_insn = next_insn_same_func(file, insn);
+                       if (next_insn && dest_off == next_insn->offset)
+                               continue;
+
This won't work on x86, where an intra-function call is converted to a
stack-modifying JUMP.  So this should probably be checked in an
arch-specific function.

Thanks for letting me know, I'll introduce arch_skip_call_warning() to
handle architecture specific cases in the next patch I send.

Can't you detect this pattern in decode and simpy not emit the call
instruction?


Yes we can, simply do:

diff --git a/tools/objtool/arch/powerpc/decode.c b/tools/objtool/arch/powerpc/decode.c
index 53b55690f320..4f9b1715caf1 100644
--- a/tools/objtool/arch/powerpc/decode.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/arch/powerpc/decode.c
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ int arch_decode_instruction(struct objtool_file *file, const struct section *sec

        switch (opcode) {
        case 18: /* b[l][a] */
-               if ((ins & 3) == 1) /* bl */
+               if ((ins & 3) == 1 && ins != 0x48000005) /* bl but not bl .+4*/
                        typ = INSN_CALL;

                imm = ins & 0x3fffffc;


Reply via email to