On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 01:52:29PM +0200, Matthias Fuchs wrote: >On Monday 08 September 2008 18:03, Scott Wood wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 05:07:15PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >> > How about "dtt"? That's what we use in U-Boot for digital temperature >> > sensors as well. >> >> I vote against any acronyms that are not very well known. Even knowing >> that it's supposed to be "digital temperature <something>", I can't >> figure out what the <something> is. Not having the context that it >> relates to temperature, I wouldn't have a clue what "dtt" is. >> >> hwmon is concise and fairly obvious, and unlike "temp" could be >> meaningfully used with chips that also monitor voltages, fan speeds, etc. >> >> -Scott > >Uh, thanks Scott. Now we got it. I am fully with you and my "V2" patch >should make everybody happy. > >So, let's apply this patch.
I already have it queued up. josh _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
