On 2/7/25 1:34 AM, Shuai Xue wrote:
The irq handler is registered for error port which recevie DPC
interrupt. Rename pdev to err_port.

No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Shuai Xue <xuesh...@linux.alibaba.com>
---

I think you can combine patch 1 & 2 into a single patch. Change wise, it looks
fine to me.

Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppusw...@linux.intel.com>

  drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c | 10 +++++-----
  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
index 242cabd5eeeb..1a54a0b657ae 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
@@ -346,21 +346,21 @@ static bool dpc_is_surprise_removal(struct pci_dev *pdev)
static irqreturn_t dpc_handler(int irq, void *context)
  {
-       struct pci_dev *pdev = context;
+       struct pci_dev *err_port = context;
/*
         * According to PCIe r6.0 sec 6.7.6, errors are an expected side effect
         * of async removal and should be ignored by software.
         */
-       if (dpc_is_surprise_removal(pdev)) {
-               dpc_handle_surprise_removal(pdev);
+       if (dpc_is_surprise_removal(err_port)) {
+               dpc_handle_surprise_removal(err_port);
                return IRQ_HANDLED;
        }
- dpc_process_error(pdev);
+       dpc_process_error(err_port);
/* We configure DPC so it only triggers on ERR_FATAL */
-       pcie_do_recovery(pdev, pci_channel_io_frozen, dpc_reset_link);
+       pcie_do_recovery(err_port, pci_channel_io_frozen, dpc_reset_link);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
  }

--
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer


Reply via email to