On 31/12/24 03:11, Thorsten Blum wrote:
Remove hard-coded strings by using the str_yes_no() helper function.

Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.b...@linux.dev>
---
  arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c | 6 ++----
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
index 4b371c738213..8c531533dd3e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
@@ -289,10 +289,8 @@ static void __init fadump_show_config(void)
        if (!fw_dump.fadump_supported)
                return;
- pr_debug("Fadump enabled : %s\n",
-                               (fw_dump.fadump_enabled ? "yes" : "no"));
-       pr_debug("Dump Active       : %s\n",
-                               (fw_dump.dump_active ? "yes" : "no"));
+       pr_debug("Fadump enabled    : %s\n", 
str_yes_no(fw_dump.fadump_enabled));
+       pr_debug("Dump Active       : %s\n", str_yes_no(fw_dump.dump_active));
        pr_debug("Dump section sizes:\n");
        pr_debug("    CPU state data size: %lx\n", fw_dump.cpu_state_data_size);
        pr_debug("    HPTE region size   : %lx\n", fw_dump.hpte_region_size);

Yes, it is better to use `str_yes_no()` instead of hard-coded strings.

I have also tested your patch, and everything is working fine.

Reviewed-by: Sourabh Jain <sourabhj...@linux.ibm.com>

Thanks,
Sourabh Jain

Reply via email to