On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 10:54:20AM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Since commit 659ad3492b91 ("perf maps: Switch from rbtree to lazily
> sorted array for addresses"), perf doesn't display anymore kernel
> symbols on powerpc, allthough it still detects them as kernel addresses.
> 
>       # Overhead  Command     Shared Object  Symbol
>       # ........  ..........  ............. 
> ......................................
>       #
>           80.49%  Coeur main  [unknown]      [k] 0xc005f0f8
>            3.91%  Coeur main  gau            [.] 
> engine_loop.constprop.0.isra.0
>            1.72%  Coeur main  [unknown]      [k] 0xc005f11c
>            1.09%  Coeur main  [unknown]      [k] 0xc01f82c8
>            0.44%  Coeur main  libc.so.6      [.] epoll_wait
>            0.38%  Coeur main  [unknown]      [k] 0xc0011718
>            0.36%  Coeur main  [unknown]      [k] 0xc01f45c0
> 
> This is because function maps__find_next_entry() now returns current
> entry instead of next entry, leading to kernel map end address
> getting mis-configured with its own start address instead of the
> start address of the following map.
> 
> Fix it by really taking the next entry, also make sure that entry
> follows current one by making sure entries are sorted.
> 
> Fixes: 659ad3492b91 ("perf maps: Switch from rbtree to lazily sorted array 
> for addresses")
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.le...@csgroup.eu>
> Reviewed-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@redhat.com>
> ---
> v2: Make sure the entries are sorted, if not sort them.

Since you have changed what I reviewed I'll have to re-review :-) Will
try to do it after some calls.

- Arnaldo

> ---
>  tools/perf/util/maps.c | 7 ++++++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/maps.c b/tools/perf/util/maps.c
> index 432399cbe5dd..09c9cc326c08 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/maps.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/maps.c
> @@ -1136,8 +1136,13 @@ struct map *maps__find_next_entry(struct maps *maps, 
> struct map *map)
>       struct map *result = NULL;
>  
>       down_read(maps__lock(maps));
> +     while (!maps__maps_by_address_sorted(maps)) {
> +             up_read(maps__lock(maps));
> +             maps__sort_by_address(maps);
> +             down_read(maps__lock(maps));
> +     }
>       i = maps__by_address_index(maps, map);
> -     if (i < maps__nr_maps(maps))
> +     if (++i < maps__nr_maps(maps))
>               result = map__get(maps__maps_by_address(maps)[i]);
>  
>       up_read(maps__lock(maps));
> -- 
> 2.47.0

Reply via email to