On 11/15/2024 1:29 PM, Easwar Hariharan wrote: > On 11/15/2024 1:26 PM, Easwar Hariharan wrote: >> This is a series that follows up on my previous series to introduce >> secs_to_jiffies() and convert a few initial users.[1] In the review for >> that series, Anna-Maria requested converting other users with >> Coccinelle. This is part 1 that converts users of msecs_to_jiffies() >> that use the multiply pattern of either of: >> - msecs_to_jiffies(N*1000), or >> - msecs_to_jiffies(N*MSEC_PER_SEC) >> >> The entire conversion is made with Coccinelle in the script added in >> patch 2. Some changes suggested by Coccinelle have been deferred to >> later parts that will address other possible variant patterns. >> >> CC: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-ma...@linutronix.de> >> Signed-off-by: Easwar Hariharan <eahar...@linux.microsoft.com> >> >> [1] >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241030-open-coded-timeouts-v3-0-9ba123fac...@linux.microsoft.com/ >> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/8734kngfni.fsf@somnus/ >> >> --- >> Changes in v2: >> - EDITME: describe what is new in this series revision. >> - EDITME: use bulletpoints and terse descriptions. >> - Link to v1: >> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241115-converge-secs-to-jiffies-v1-0-19aadc349...@linux.microsoft.com >> > > Apologies, I missed out on editing the changelog here. v1 included a > patch that's already been accepted, there are no other changes in v2. > > Thanks, > Easwar
How do you expect this series to land since it overlaps a large number of maintainer trees? Do you have a maintainer who has volunteered to take the series and the maintainers should just ack? Or do you want the maintainers to take the individual patches that are applicable to them? /jeff
