On Wed, 13 Nov 2024 07:23:43 +0530 Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.l...@gmail.com> wrote:
> "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.l...@gmail.com> writes: > > > cma_init_reserved_mem() checks base and size alignment with > > CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_BYTES. However, some users might call this during > > early boot when pageblock_order is 0. That means if base and size does > > not have pageblock_order alignment, it can cause functional failures > > during cma activate area. > > > > So let's enforce pageblock_order to be non-zero during > > cma_init_reserved_mem(). > > > > Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> > > Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.l...@gmail.com> > > --- > > v2 -> v3: Separated the series into 2 as discussed in v2. > > [v2]: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/cover.1728585512.git.ritesh.l...@gmail.com/ > > > > mm/cma.c | 9 +++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > Gentle ping. Is this going into -next? I pay little attention to anything marked "RFC". Let me take a look.
