On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 04:03:34PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 08:52:40PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > > > > > On October 4, 2024 2:33:54 AM GMT+10:00, "Jason A. Donenfeld" > > <ja...@zx2c4.com> wrote: > > >Hey Christophe, Michael, > > > > > >This series actually looks pretty okay to me. I realize ThomasW is > > >working on more generic cleanups that might obliterate the need for > > >this, and that may or may not wind up in 6.13. But, I was thinking, this > > >seems like a good correct thing to do, and to do it now for 6.12, maybe > > >as a fix through the powerpc tree. Then ThomasW can base his work atop > > >this, which might wind up including the nice lr optimizations you've > > >made. And then also if ThomasW's work doesn't land or gets reverted or > > >whatever, at least we'll have this in tree for 6.12. > > > > > >Michael - what do you think of that? Worth taking these two patches into > > >your fixes? > > > > I agree the series looks good. But they're not fixes by my reading, so I'd > > be inclined to put them in next for v6.13? > > They're "close enough" to fixes. The get_realdatapage stuff is super > wonky and weird and it's quite good Christophe has gotten rid of it. > Returning NULL from the generic accesor function never really sat right > and looks buggy even if it does work. But more to the point, given the > other scheduled churn for 6.13, it's going to be a tree-clashing > nightmare to get this in later. And this Sunday is rc2 only, so why not.
Bumping to top of the box. Jason