Replace `cpumask_any_and(a, b) >= nr_cpu_ids`
with the more readable `!cpumask_intersects(a, b)`.

Signed-off-by: Costa Shulyupin <costa.s...@redhat.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c 
b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c
index fa01818c1972c..a6c388bdf5d08 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c
@@ -726,7 +726,7 @@ static int xive_irq_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
        pr_debug("%s: irq %d/0x%x\n", __func__, d->irq, hw_irq);
 
        /* Is this valid ? */
-       if (cpumask_any_and(cpumask, cpu_online_mask) >= nr_cpu_ids)
+       if (!cpumask_intersects(cpumask, cpu_online_mask))
                return -EINVAL;
 
        /*
-- 
2.45.0


Reply via email to