Kou Ishizaki wrote:
> 
> Roel,
> 
>> untested, is it correct?
> 
> Your patch is correct.
> 
> Thanks for your pointing it out and sending the patch. I tested your
> patch and it works good.
> 
> Fortunately, this bug is not fatal because it seems that the SCC-UHC
> sets SCC_UHC_USBEN and SCC_UHC_USBCEN at once.
> 
> 
> Your patch does not contain 'Signed-off-by' line. Could you re-post it
> with your sign?

Sorry for that and thanks for testing.
---
duplicate SCC_UHC_USBCEN

Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/celleb_scc_uhc.c 
b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/celleb_scc_uhc.c
index d63b720..b086f33 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/celleb_scc_uhc.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/celleb_scc_uhc.c
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
 
 static inline int uhc_clkctrl_ready(u32 val)
 {
-       const u32 mask = SCC_UHC_USBCEN | SCC_UHC_USBCEN;
+       const u32 mask = SCC_UHC_USBCEN | SCC_UHC_USBEN;
        return((val & mask) == mask);
 }
 
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to