On 28/05/2024 15:15, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > Le 28/05/2024 à 14:28, Esben Haabendal a écrit : >> [Vous ne recevez pas souvent de courriers de [email protected]. Découvrez >> pourquoi ceci est important à https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] >> >> While use of fsl_ifc driver with NAND flash is fine, as the fsl_ifc_nand >> driver selects FSL_IFC automatically, we need the CONFIG_FSL_IFC option to >> be selectable for platforms using fsl_ifc with NOR flash. > > I don't understand. > > Shall I understand : > > While use of fsl_ifc driver with NAND flash is fine as the fsl_ifc_nand > driver selects FSL_IFC automatically, .... > > or > > ..., as the fsl_ifc_nand driver selects FSL_IFC automatically we need > the CONFIG_FSL_IFC option to be selectable for platforms using fsl_ifc > with NOR flash > > > > I'm fine with the fact that you want to be able to select it when you > use NOR flashes,
But users are not fine... their memory won't work if they cannot choose it (if you meant select=choose). > allthough I can't see why, but why do you need to > change the "select" to a "depend" ? You should be able to leave it as a As explained in v1: user-visible symbols should not be selected. Nothing odd here. > "select" in which case patch 2 wouldn't be necessary. Best regards, Krzysztof
