On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 07:06:27AM +0100, Tim Yamin wrote: > On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > While on this topic; have you had a chance to address the comments you > > received on v2 of your patch? I'm keen to get your change merged in, > > but there are a few more things that need to be sorted out. > > I'm still trying to determine whether the locking stuff is needed or > not. I think ultimately it might be a bug caused by hardware problems > at this end as opposed to silicon problems affecting everybody, but I > won't have an answer regarding this for a while because new hardware > needs to be prototyped to test out this theory. > > I think the patch can probably be resubmitted with the locking stuff > removed, and the driver can be marked as experimental for everybody to > try out: if people experience any corruption problems I'm sure they > can speak up :-) > > Any objections?
Sounds good to me. You will get more testers that way. I can pick it up for -next if everything else looks good. g. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
