On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 5:07 AM, Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 12:50:11 +0200, Jochen Friedrich wrote: >> Hi Wolfgang, >> >> > $ grep I2C_CLASS_HWMON * >> > i2c-cpm.c: .class = I2C_CLASS_HWMON | I2C_CLASS_SPD, >> > i2c-mpc.c: .class = I2C_CLASS_HWMON | I2C_CLASS_SPD, >> > i2c-ibm_iic.c: adap->class = I2C_CLASS_HWMON | I2C_CLASS_SPD; >> > i2c-pasemi.c: smbus->adapter.class = I2C_CLASS_HWMON | I2C_CLASS_SPD; >> > i2c-mv64xxx.c: drv_data->adapter.class = I2C_CLASS_HWMON | >> > I2C_CLASS_SPD; >> > >> > It would be consequent to remove them as well. >> >> ACK for the i2c-cpm part. > > No objection on my side. It's really up to each platform to choose the > way they want to handle i2c device creation, and stick to it. > > As I understand it, the removal of the adapter class needs to be > synchronized with platform code changes. Thus it might make sense to > push these through their respective arch trees, rather than the i2c > tree.
All right, I'm happy to pick these patches up if nobody objects. g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
