Andy, Yury, On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 13:50:48 -0800 Yury Norov <yury.no...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 05:49:59PM +0100, Herve Codina wrote: > > Hi Andy, Yury, > > > > On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 17:39:27 +0200 > > Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > ... > > > > + * bitmap_scatter() for the bitmap scatter detailed operations). > > > > > > > + * Suppose scattered computed using bitmap_scatter(scattered, src, > > > > mask, n). > > > > + * The operation bitmap_gather(result, scattered, mask, n) leads to a > > > > result > > > > + * equal or equivalent to src. > > > > > > This paragraph... > > > > > > > + * The result can be 'equivalent' because bitmap_scatter() and > > > > bitmap_gather() > > > > + * are not bijective. > > > > > > > > > > + * The result and src values are equivalent in that sense that a call > > > > to > > > > + * bitmap_scatter(res, src, mask, n) and a call to bitmap_scatter(res, > > > > result, > > > > + * mask, n) will lead to the same res value. > > > > > > ...seems duplicating this one. > > > > > > I would drop the latter one. > > > > I would like to give details about the 'equivalent' in this scatter/gather > > case. > > If you would like - please do! :) > > > If Yury is ok, I can drop this last paragraph. > > The original bitmap_onto() description is 3 times longer, and barely > that descriptive. I'm OK with your working and especially pictures. > Right, I will keep my last paragraph in the next iteration. Regards, Hervé
