Hi Andy, Yury,
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 11:13:13 -0800
Yury Norov <yury.no...@gmail.com> wrote:
...
>
> That's I agree. Scatter/gather from your last approach sound better.
> Do you plan to send a v2?
>
...
>
> I think your scatter/gather is better then this onto/off by naming and
> implementation. If you'll send a v2, and it would work for Herve, I'd
> prefer scatter/gather. But we can live with onto/off as well.
>
Andy, I tested your bitmap_{scatter,gather}() in my code.
I simply replaced my bitmap_{onto,off}() calls by calls to your helpers and
it works perfectly for my use case.
I didn't use your whole patch
"[PATCH v1 2/5] lib/bitmap: Introduce bitmap_scatter() and bitmap_gather()
helpers"
because it didn't apply on a v6.8-rc1 based branch.
I just manually extracted the needed functions for my tests and I didn't look
at the lib/test_bitmap.c part.
Now what's the plan ?
Andy, do you want to send a v2 of this patch or may I get the patch, modify it
according to reviews already present in v1 and integrate it in my current
series ?
Yury, any preferences ?
Best regards,
Hervé
--
Hervé Codina, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
