On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 2:13 PM, John Rigby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So get_immrbase can function without a device_type = "soc" > property in the soc node. > > The "soc" node should really be named "immr" > because it does not include the entire soc, however > u-boot currently looks up this node by name for > a clock fixup so leave it "soc" for now. We will change > it later after 5121 u-boot uses the immr alias instead > of the node name.
Is it not sufficient to search the tree for a node with the <chip>-immr compatible value? I don't think this is the intended use case of aliases. g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
