On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 18:25:02 +0200 "Arnd Bergmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shouldn't this instead use the device tree, like fsl_elbc, fsl_upm > and pasemi_nand do? > It feels awfully backwards to hardcode this stuff in the platform > source code. Yes, yes it should. This is just a patch to get the driver working... it is not a full blown of platform driver. Currently there is no working NDFC driver in the kernel. I felt a working driver, even if less than optimal, is better than not supporting NAND on the 44x. This driver is no worse than the arch/ppc version was, it is just no better ;) Cheers, Sean _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
