On 2024/1/25 21:47, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
On 1/25/24 3:16 PM, Kunwu Chan wrote:
This part was commented in about 17 years before.
If there are no plans to enable this part code in the future,
we can remove this dead code.

Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <chen...@kylinos.cn>
---
  arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu-hash.h | 22 -------------------
  1 file changed, 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu-hash.h 
b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu-hash.h
index 1c4eebbc69c9..d39ec7134a78 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu-hash.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu-hash.h
@@ -731,26 +731,6 @@ struct hash_mm_context {
  #endif /* CONFIG_PPC_SUBPAGE_PROT */
  };
-#if 0
-/*
- * The code below is equivalent to this function for arguments
- * < 2^VSID_BITS, which is all this should ever be called
- * with.  However gcc is not clever enough to compute the
- * modulus (2^n-1) without a second multiply.
- */
-#define vsid_scramble(protovsid, size) \
-       ((((protovsid) * VSID_MULTIPLIER_##size) % VSID_MODULUS_##size))
-
-/* simplified form avoiding mod operation */
-#define vsid_scramble(protovsid, size) \
-       ({                                                               \
-               unsigned long x;                                         \
-               x = (protovsid) * VSID_MULTIPLIER_##size;                \
-               x = (x >> VSID_BITS_##size) + (x & VSID_MODULUS_##size); \
-               (x + ((x+1) >> VSID_BITS_##size)) & VSID_MODULUS_##size; \
-       })
-
-#else /* 1 */
  static inline unsigned long vsid_scramble(unsigned long protovsid,
                                  unsigned long vsid_multiplier, int vsid_bits)
  {
@@ -764,8 +744,6 @@ static inline unsigned long vsid_scramble(unsigned long 
protovsid,
        return (vsid + ((vsid + 1) >> vsid_bits)) & vsid_modulus;
  }
-#endif /* 1 */
-
  /* Returns the segment size indicator for a user address */
  static inline int user_segment_size(unsigned long addr)
  {

That was done to make sure one can follow the actual compiled code better.
Thanks for your explanation. It's my bad.

-aneesh

--
Thanks,
  Kunwu

Reply via email to